header-left
File #: 2007-0790    Version: Name: Glen Oaks Industrial Park Lot #2
Type: MOTION Status: IN BOARD OF TRUSTEES
File created: 12/6/2007 In control: Board of Trustees
On agenda: Final action: 2/4/2008
Title: /Name/Summary Glen Oaks Industrial Park Lot #2
Title/Name/Summary
Glen Oaks Industrial Park Lot #2

History
The petitioner is proposing a single story, 6,820 square-foot building and accessory surface parking on a 1.05-acre site Lot 2 of the Glen Oaks Industrial Park. Proposed elevations would be consistent in design with existing buildings in the Winterset III office complex to the south. This proposal continues the petitioner's goal to continue the expansion of the Winterset Office Park that has already begun with the development of Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 in the Glen Oaks Industrial Park. The Glen Oak Industrial Park is a 23.7-acre, 16-lot industrial subdivision on the east side of 108th Avenue at 165th Street.
This petition originally included a variance request to allow for parking in the front yard setback but the petitioner has revised the plan to move the parking to the rear of the building, negating the need for a variance and setting up the framework for a similar development pattern for the remaining vacant lots.

On January 8, 2008 the Plan Commission moved to recommend to the Village Board, approval of the Preliminary Site Plan entitled “Lot 2 Glen Oaks Industrial Park”, prepared by Raymond E. Derbas and Associates, CADD reference number 07009, dated 11/29/07, sheet C.2.0 and the building elevations entitled Lot 2; 10730-36 W 165th Street, prepared by Craig A. Podalak Architects, dated 09-14-06, sheet A4, subject to the following conditions: (1) that all final engineering-related items are met; (2) that the petitioner submit an Engineering Plan for separate review and approval within 60 days of final engineering approval; (3) that the petitioner submit building elevation with dimensions, materials and colors before the Committee meeting; (4) that the petitioner shift the building to the street and move the parking to the rear of the site; and (5) that the petitioner work with Staff to determine the final front yard setbacks with relation to the sewer.

And
Moved to recommend to the...

Click here for full text