Title/Name/Summary
10660 143rd Street Zoning Map Amendment
History
Petitioner: Joyce Glynn (Property Owner)
Requested Actions: The Petitioner seeks approval of a zoning map amendment to rezone their property from E-1 Estate Residential to BIZ Business Residential in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Land Development Code (LDC) §5-108
Address: 10660 143rd Street, Orland Park, IL
P.I.N.s: 27-05-404-017-1001
Parcel Size: +/- 0.93 acres
The subject property was annexed into the Village on October 10, 2025 (Ordinance No. 6048). Parcels are automatically zoned E-1 Residential upon annexation.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Planning District: Orland Grove Planning District
Planning Land Use Designation: Office Employment Cluster
ZONING DISTRICT
Existing: E-1 Estate Residential
Proposed: BIZ General Business District
LAND USE
Existing: Office
Proposed: Office
The petitioner requests approval of a zoning map amendment to change the zoning of the subject property from E-1 residential to BIZ General Business District. The Comprehensive Plan designates the parcel as part of an Office Emphasis Employment Cluster.
The subject parcel currently houses offices for an insurance agent, medical billing and psychiatric services. The office buildings to the west of the property are zoned BIZ, hence re-zoning the subject property as BIZ would serve to promote consistency of uses within the Orland Grove Planning District.
When reviewing an application for rezoning property, the decision-making body shall review the following factors for consideration. The petitioner has submitted responses to the factors, which are attached to this case file. Staff finds the petitioner responses satisfactory and recommends approval of the zoning map amendment from E-1 Estate Residential to BIZ General Business District. The factors below come principally from the 1957 case LaSalle v. County of Cook:
1. The existing uses and zoning of nearby property;
2. The extent to which property values are diminished by a particular zoning classification or restriction;
3. The extent to which the destruction of property value of a petitioning property owner promotes the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the public;
4. The relative gain to the public as opposed to the hardship imposed on a petitioning property owner;
5. The suitability of the subject property for its zoned purposes;
6. The length of time the property has been vacant as zoned, considered in the context of land development in the area;
7. The Comprehensive Plan designation and the current applicability of that designation;
8. The evidence or lack of evidence, of community need for the use proposed.
Regarding Case Number 2025-0902, also known as 10660 143rd Street Zoning Map Amendment, Staff recommends to accept and make findings of fact as discussed at this Plan Commission meeting and within the Staff Report dated xxxxx;
And
Staff recommends that the Plan Commission approve a zoning map amendment for 10660 143rd Street from E-1 Estate Residential to BIZ General Business District.
Regarding Case Number 2025-0902, also known as 10660 143rd Street Zoning Map Amendment, I move to approve the Staff Recommended Action as presented in the Staff Report to the Plan Commission for this case.