header-left
File #: 2014-0726    Version: Name: Appearance Review Fees
Type: MOTION Status: PASSED
File created: 11/26/2014 In control: Board of Trustees
On agenda: 7/6/2015 Final action: 7/6/2015
Title: /Name/Summary Appearance Review Fees
Attachments: 1. Appearance Review Fee Exhibit 052215
Title/Name/Summary
Appearance Review Fees

History
QUICKFACTS

Project
Appearance Review Fees

Petitioner
Village of Orland Park

Purpose
The purpose of this item is to establish a fee schedule for Appearance Reviews.

OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND

Section 5-106 of the Land Development Code (LDC) presents the standards and processes related to Appearance Reviews, which typically focus on the reuse or modification of existing properties. The main purpose of an Appearance Review is to ensure that the appearance and intensity of development within the Village is consistent with the community character of the area within which the development is located.

As set forth in the LDC, the Development Services Department is authorized to conduct an Appearance Review in the following instances:

1. When minor exterior site and building changes are proposed for an existing development (excludes single-family residential and multi-family less than six (6) units);

2. When a restaurant that is not a Special Use occupies an existing or vacant former restaurant space and proposes exterior modifications; and

3. When antenna equipment is co-located on an existing tower with no expansion of the ground equipment area.

When certain changes are proposed on any property located within the Old Orland Historic District (OOH) or to Landmarks, the process is similar to an Appearance Review but is labeled a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA). A COA is typically required for new construction projects and for any changes to existing structures, both residential and non-residential. This amendment proposes no changes to the COA process.

FEE RECOMMENDATION

At present, there are no fees associated with an Appearance Review.

Prior to the creation of the Appearance review process in 2006 (2006-0283), most petitions would have gone through the full approval process (Plan Commission, Committee, Board) and the Village thus collected the appropriate site plan review fees. By creating the admini...

Click here for full text